{"id":7169,"date":"2026-09-11T11:35:12","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T11:35:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/?p=7169"},"modified":"2026-10-31T14:22:02","modified_gmt":"2026-10-31T14:22:02","slug":"iccj-decision-25-2025-road-traffic-files","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/","title":{"rendered":"CCJ Decision 25\/2025: drugs while driving and the necessary evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The decision of the Supreme Court of Cassation no. 25\/2025 concerns the offense of driving a vehicle under the influence of psychoactive substances, as provided for by Article 336, paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. The preliminary ruling, mandatory upon publication in the Official Gazette, requires the determination of two elements: the presence of the psychoactive substance in biological the evidence and its ability to cause impairment of the ability to drive.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the mere mention of a positive result does not replace the analysis required by law. At the same time, the decision does not require that it be demonstrated that the driver displayed visibly unsafe behavior or that his\/her abilities were actually impaired to a certain degree. The substance\u2019s ability to affect driving should not be confused with evidence of an accident, a wrong maneuver, or obvious clinical signs.<\/p>\n<h2>What the Supreme Court established<\/h2>\n<p>The CCJ resolved a difference of interpretation regarding Article 336, paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. In the operative part <a href=\"https:\/\/legislatie.just.ro\/Public\/DetaliiDocument\/293958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Decision no. 25 of January 27, 2025<\/a>, The Court, published in Official Monitor No. 70 of January 28, 2025, determined that both the presence of the substance in the biological the evidence and its ability to determine impairment of the ability to drive must be established.<\/p>\n<p>The decision does not set a universal numerical threshold for all substances and does not transform the lack of visibly affected behavior into an automatic cause for payment. It requires that the concrete elements of the case be analyzed in relation to the legal condition and the evidence administered.<\/p>\n<h2>What needs to be checked in the file<\/h2>\n<p>The analysis does not reduce to a \u201epositive\u201d or \u201enegative\u201d result. Depending on the identified substance and the documents in the file, the following may be relevant:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the identified substance and whether the result relates to the active substance or a metabolite;<\/li>\n<li>the biological sample analyzed, the reported concentration and the laboratory method;<\/li>\n<li>the interval between the moment of management, testing and sample collection;<\/li>\n<li>the conclusions of the toxicological or forensic report and the data on which it is based;<\/li>\n<li>the medicines administered and the medical documents, if they are related to the cause;<\/li>\n<li>the consistency between the biological the evidence, documents, records, observations and statements.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These aspects do not automatically lead to the exclusion of a evidence or to its payment. They help verify the significance of the result and whether the evidence meet the requirement established by the ICCJ. An expert opinion can be useful when there is a real scientific problem to be clarified; its necessity and objectives are assessed in the specific case file.<\/p>\n<h2>The presence of the metabolite and the moment of harvesting<\/h2>\n<p>The detection of a substance or a metabolite must be interpreted in relation to the analyzed sample, the elapsed time, and the conclusions of the specialists. It cannot be inferred, solely from an isolated value, the effect on the person at the time of administration. Similarly, the mere invocation of a time interval or a treatment does not resolve the cause without analyzing the evidence.<\/p>\n<p>For the applicable medical-legal framework, see also <a href=\"https:\/\/csml.ro\/metodologie-expertiza-medico-legala-pentru-stabilirea-starii-de-influenta-indusa-de-substantele-psihoactive\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the methodology published by the Superior Council of Forensic Medicine<\/a>. The conclusions must be reported in relation to the form and content of the documents actually prepared in the respective case.<\/p>\n<h2>What does not result from Decision no. 25\/2025<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>A positive result does not, in itself, mean that the legal analysis is complete.<\/li>\n<li>The decision does not establish a general numerical threshold applicable to any psychoactive substance.<\/li>\n<li>It does not, as a rule, require an accident or a dangerous maneuver to constitute the crime.<\/li>\n<li>The absence of visible signs of impairment does not in itself establish guilt or innocence.<\/li>\n<li>The judgment concerns Article 336, paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code and does not automatically extend to any road violation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Practical steps for defense<\/h2>\n<p>The person being investigated may request the lawyer to examine the acts of collection and analysis, the toxicological report, the chronology and all relevant evidence. If there is an unclear technical issue, the defense may submit requests for clarification or the administration of an expert opinion, with objectives adapted to the case and the procedural framework. The result depends on the totality of the evidence, not on a standard formula.<\/p>\n<p>The decision of the Court of Cassation no. 25\/2025 is important for understanding the condition of \u201eunder the influence\u201d in Article 336, paragraph (2). A correct assessment distinguishes between the presence of the substance, its ability to affect driving ability, and the evidence of the concrete facts in the case file.<\/p>\n<h2>Collecting the samples and the next steps<\/h2>\n<p>The rules approved by <a href=\"https:\/\/legislatie.just.ro\/Public\/DetaliiDocumentAfis\/285722\">HG no. 877\/2024<\/a> For the analysis of psychoactive substances, we recommend collecting a blood sample of 15 ml and a urine sample of at least 20 ml. The verification of the collection documents, the toxicology report and the medico-legal conclusions must be reported in the specific case file. For additional context, see also <a href=\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/conducerea-sub-influenta-substantelor-psihoactive-ghid-complet\/\">The guide on driving under the influence of psychoactive substances<\/a>. If you have received documents in a criminal case, request a legal analysis of the documents and the deadlines before making statements or requests.<\/p>\n<p><em>Informative material; the legal conclusion depends on the applicable law, the evidence and the specific acts.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Decizia \u00ceCCJ nr. 25\/2025 prive\u0219te infrac\u021biunea de conducere a unui vehicul sub influen\u021ba substan\u021belor psihoactive, prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 336 alin. (2) Cod penal. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea prealabil\u0103, obligatorie de la publicarea \u00een Monitorul Oficial, cere constatarea a dou\u0103 elemente: prezen\u021ba substan\u021bei psihoactive \u00een probele biologice \u0219i aptitudinea acesteia de a putea determina afectarea capacit\u0103\u021bii de a conduce. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7170,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[173],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-penal"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare - Avocat Bucuresti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025 cere verificarea substan\u021bei din probe \u0219i a aptitudinii acesteia de a putea afecta conducerea.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/iccj-decision-25-2025-road-traffic-files\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare - Avocat Bucuresti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025 cere verificarea substan\u021bei din probe \u0219i a aptitudinii acesteia de a putea afecta conducerea.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/iccj-decision-25-2025-road-traffic-files\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Avocat Bucuresti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-11T11:35:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-31T14:22:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35-1024x683.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/553d1b6a4034129ac3e61fdf4c95fba6\"},\"headline\":\"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-11T11:35:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-31T14:22:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/\"},\"wordCount\":773,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Penal\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/\",\"name\":\"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare - Avocat Bucuresti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-11T11:35:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-31T14:22:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/553d1b6a4034129ac3e61fdf4c95fba6\"},\"description\":\"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025 cere verificarea substan\u021bei din probe \u0219i a aptitudinii acesteia de a putea afecta conducerea.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Prima pagin\u0103\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/\",\"name\":\"Avocat Bucuresti\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/553d1b6a4034129ac3e61fdf4c95fba6\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/eb12eb9f657be7f3cd6b70166030afbebff1c59238e796fadd1c5e5e846c408b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/eb12eb9f657be7f3cd6b70166030afbebff1c59238e796fadd1c5e5e846c408b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/eb12eb9f657be7f3cd6b70166030afbebff1c59238e796fadd1c5e5e846c408b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCJ Decision 25\/2025: drugs while driving and the necessary evidence - Lawyer Bucharest","description":"The decision of the Court of Cassation 25\/2025 requires the verification of the substance of the evidence and its ability to affect driving.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/iccj-decision-25-2025-road-traffic-files\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare - Avocat Bucuresti","og_description":"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025 cere verificarea substan\u021bei din probe \u0219i a aptitudinii acesteia de a putea afecta conducerea.","og_url":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/iccj-decision-25-2025-road-traffic-files\/","og_site_name":"Avocat Bucuresti","article_published_time":"2026-09-11T11:35:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-31T14:22:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35-1024x683.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/553d1b6a4034129ac3e61fdf4c95fba6"},"headline":"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare","datePublished":"2026-09-11T11:35:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-31T14:22:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/"},"wordCount":773,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png","articleSection":["Penal"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/","url":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/","name":"CCJ Decision 25\/2025: drugs while driving and the necessary evidence - Lawyer Bucharest","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png","datePublished":"2026-09-11T11:35:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-31T14:22:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/553d1b6a4034129ac3e61fdf4c95fba6"},"description":"The decision of the Court of Cassation 25\/2025 requires the verification of the substance of the evidence and its ability to affect driving.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-11-sept.-2026-14_31_35.png","width":1536,"height":1024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/decizia-iccj-25-2025-dosare-rutiere\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Prima pagin\u0103","item":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Decizia \u00ceCCJ 25\/2025: droguri la volan \u0219i probele necesare"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#website","url":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/","name":"Lawyer in Bucharest","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/553d1b6a4034129ac3e61fdf4c95fba6","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/eb12eb9f657be7f3cd6b70166030afbebff1c59238e796fadd1c5e5e846c408b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/eb12eb9f657be7f3cd6b70166030afbebff1c59238e796fadd1c5e5e846c408b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/eb12eb9f657be7f3cd6b70166030afbebff1c59238e796fadd1c5e5e846c408b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro"],"url":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7169"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7340,"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7169\/revisions\/7340"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatbucuresti.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}