Lawyer for challenges to decisions closing criminal cases in Bucharest
You received a closure of the criminal investigation order and you believe that the evidence was not properly analyzed? We are verifying the reasoning, the communication of the act and the steps already taken, in order to identify the procedural stage and the criticisms that can be made.
Schedule an appointment: 0732.710.701 · WhatsApp · vreau@avocatbucuresti.ro.
Description
Complaint against the closure of the criminal investigation solution
You received a closure of the criminal investigation order and you believe that the evidence was not properly analyzed? We are verifying the reasoning, the communication of the act and the steps already taken, in order to identify the procedural stage and the criticisms that can be made.
What services we offer
- Analysis of the ordinance and the available material from the file
- Preparation of the complaint to the competent prosecutor
- Complaint to the preliminary court judge, under the law
- Organizing the arguments regarding the evidence and the reasoning of the solution
Documents for the initial discussion
Prepare, if you have them: the full order, proof of communication, the initial complaint, the documents submitted and the responses received. Keep the documents in their entirety, including the attachments and evidence of communication. Note any summons, responses or close of date.
Frequently asked questions
Can I go directly to the judge after any closure of the criminal investigation?
The procedure involves verifying the stage of the complaint with the competent prosecutor and the way it was resolved. Not all situations allow for the same immediate action.
Care sunt termenele pentru contestarea clasării?
Plângerea la procurorul competent se formulează în 20 de zile de la comunicarea copiei actului de clasare, potrivit art. 339 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură penală. Dacă această plângere este respinsă, art. 340 alin. (1) prevede 20 de zile de la comunicarea soluției pentru sesizarea judecătorului de cameră preliminară competent.
Dacă plângerea la procuror nu este soluționată în termenul legal de 20 de zile, sesizarea judecătorului poate fi făcută după împlinirea acestui termen, dar cel târziu în 20 de zile de la comunicarea modului de rezolvare, conform art. 340 alin. (2). Păstrează actele comunicate, plicurile sau confirmările electronice și dovada depunerii plângerii. Verificăm separat fiecare etapă și data de început a termenului. Dispozițiile art. 339–340, redate în Decizia CCR nr. 305/2025, verificate la 7 noiembrie 2026.
Is it enough to repeat the initial complaint?
It is necessary to respond to the concrete reasons for the classification and to show the relevant criticisms. The analysis focuses on the challenged solution and the evidence in the case file.
How we start the collaboration
We discuss the objective and urgency, then establish the documents necessary for the analysis. We explain the options, evidence, and risks before choosing the approach. The services and fees are determined by a legal assistance contract, depending on the complexity of the case.
Lawyer Constantin Andor, in the bar since 2000, provides assistance through his office and professional collaborations adapted to the nature of the case. The solution of a procedure depends on evidence and the competent authority.
Schedule an appointment: 0732.710.701 · WhatsApp · vreau@avocatbucuresti.ro.
